===== SamuraiLink3's File Dump =====

==== Open Tests ====
  * None

==== Completed Tests ====

=== Whistle Crew Micro Bitonal ===

  * {{ :wiki:testing_prusawhistles_whistlecrewmicrobitonal_mk4.3mf |__TESTING PLATE__ - Whistle Crew Micro Bitonal (3MF)}}
    * [[models_38mm-micro-bitonal-half-height-hole|Whistle Crew Micro Bitonal]] with classic wall generation and a 0.6HF nozzle
      * Arachne left a pin-hole on the non-key-ring side chamber, leaving it silent unless plugged, classic wall generation seems to avoid this issue
    * Initial single-whistle test done. Seems to work well, both chambers are loud. Structure is solid and unlikely to break under normal use
  * {{ :wiki:testing_prusawhistles_whistlecrewmicrobitonal_x96_mk4.3mf |__TESTING PLATE__ - Whistle Crew Micro Bitonal x96 (3MF)}}
    * [[models_38mm-micro-bitonal-half-height-hole|Whistle Crew Micro Bitonal]] with classic wall generation and a 0.6HF nozzle
    * Initial mechanical and manual testing of 10 whistles from this plate had a 100% success rating.
    * Will print on MK3S and another MK4 plate to verify
    * Second MK4 plate was perfect, all 10 whistles passed QA.
    * First MK3S plate was //bad//. >25% whistles with at least one chamber silent. From a visual inspection, it appears my first layer may be too high, resulting in gaps, or I need to slightly increase the extrusion multiplier. For the moment, tasked MK3S to print Pocket Riots.
    * Tests have resulted in the following wiki page: [[printers_prusa_plates_whistle-crew-micro-bitonal|Whistle Crew Micro Bitonal]]
    * Test Closed

=== Penne 2.0 ===
  * Penne 2.0
    * Warnings: Not louder than 38mm micro bitonal
      * TODO: Compare to Pocket Riot
      * TODO: Find and install db meter, ask group for testing methodologies, document
    * MK3S: TODO
    * MK4: Printed single test whistle
      * Tests show that the Penne 2.0 produces less-audible sound with a harder "toot". Will stick to 38mm Micro Bitonals and Pocket Riots for now.
    * Test Closed